Lecture Atlas

//week-11

EGD102

//study-guide

Inferred

Week 11 Study Guide — Normal Stress and Strain + Mechanical Properties

Directly supported by notes

These sub-topics are explicitly covered in the lecture slides and tutorial PDFs:

TopicDirect source coverage
Axial stress Slides 4–7 + Tutorial recap 3 + Exercises 1, 4, 5
Axial strain Slides 8–9 + Tutorial recap 4 + Exercises 1, 6
Hooke’s law / Young’s modulusSlides 11–12 + Tutorial recap 5–6 + Exercise 2
Engineering vs. true stress / strainSlide 13
Stress–strain diagram (yield, UTS, fracture)Slide 14 + Tutorial recap 9–10 + Exercise 3
0.2% offset yield methodSlide 16 + Tutorial recap 11 + Exercise 3
Ductility (%EL, %AR)Slide 15
Factor of safety + allowable stressSlides 18–19 + Tutorial recap 14 + Exercise 5
Cable car worked exampleSlide 20 (Example 5)
Poisson’s ratioSlides 21–23 + Tutorial recap 16–17 + Exercise 6

The workshop expects you to be able to:

  1. Free-body a joint, solve for the axial force, then compute .
  2. Find and read the resulting .
  3. Compute from a stress/strain pair or read it as a slope.
  4. Read yield, UTS, and the 0.2% offset yield from a plotted curve.
  5. Apply a safety factor to size a member or count passengers.
  6. Use Poisson’s ratio to predict lateral deformation and cross-sectional change.

Strongly inferred from workshop materials

The lecture also frames (in this order):

  • Structural actions (slide 3) — tension, compression, shear, bending, torsion, loading combinations. EGD102 limits itself to axial + shear.
  • A worked free-body / equilibrium step in Example 2 (the two-rod lamp).
  • The “Force is ALWAYS in newtons” reminder at the top of every unit-sensitive calculation.
  • Rule-of-thumb ranges by industry (slide 19).
  • Typical Poisson’s ratios for common materials (slide 22).

Possible lecture content (not in notes)

May appear in the lecture but is not in the workshop:

  • Hooke’s-law assumptions (small strain, homogeneous + isotropic material).
  • Resilience and toughness as areas under the curve.
  • True stress–strain conversion formulas .
  • Hardness measures (Brinell, Rockwell, Vickers) as proxies for strength.

Gaps requiring official source check

  • Whether the final exam asks for engineering vs. true numerical comparisons or just the qualitative distinction.
  • Whether the 0.2% offset is examined symbolically (read off a curve) or numerically (from given gradient + slope).
  • Solutions PDF for Tutorial 11 is not provided — exercise answers below are the expected forms but should be cross-checked against the official sheet.

Worked examples

Three notes cover the topic at different depths:

  • Lecture summary — slide-by-slide reconstruction with worked Examples 1, 2, 3, 5 and Example 5 continued.
  • Cheatsheet — every formula and recipe on one page. Includes the full quiz.
  • In-depth analysis — why each formula exists, the physical picture behind necking and Poisson’s ratio, and a full exam-style worked example for the aluminium rod (Exercise 6).

Common mistakes

  • Unit slip: mixing kN with mm² gives GPa, not MPa. Convert force to N first.
  • Steel in MPa instead of GPa — off by 1000.
  • 0.5% = 0.005, not .
  • Missing minus sign on Poisson’s ratio: definition has it.
  • Rounding people up rather than down when sizing for .
  • Confusing yield, UTS, and fracture stress — three distinct points on the curve.
  • Forgetting trig sign conventions at joints (is the 3 the vertical leg of the 3-4-5?).

Practice questions

Pick from Tutorial 11. Recommended pass:

  • Stress + strain: Exercises 1, 2.
  • Stress–strain diagram + offset yield: Exercise 3.
  • Multi-member free body: Exercise 4 (two-wire bilinear curve).
  • Factor of safety / sizing: Exercise 5 (flowerpot).
  • Poisson’s ratio: Exercise 6 (aluminium rod) — fully worked in the in-depth note.

Quick answer-form hints:

ExerciseQuantity askedHint
1, ; ;
2, , then
3, Slope of linear part; 0.2% offset line parallel to slope
4, Joint equilibrium ; ; pick branch of bilinear curve;
5; ;
6, , , ; ;

Assessment relevance

  • This week feeds Portfolio 10/11 directly.
  • Final exam: high probability of a multi-part tensile-test or cable-loading question that walks through stress → strain → modulus → safety factor → diameter change in sequence.
  • The Poisson’s-ratio diameter-change step is a common “show all working” item.

Confidence report

  • Directly supported: every formula, slide-cited example, and tutorial exercise listed above.
  • Inferred: the lecture’s narrative ordering and the framing of structural actions.
  • Gap: solutions to Tutorial 11 (no solutions PDF supplied); coverage depth of true-stress numerical conversion.

Source files used

  • EGD102-Physics/Lecture11_CTP1.pdf
  • EGD102-Physics/Tutorial 11.pdf